moonarchitect.blogg.se

Amd radeon r9 m395 drivers for mac
Amd radeon r9 m395 drivers for mac





  1. #Amd radeon r9 m395 drivers for mac 1080p
  2. #Amd radeon r9 m395 drivers for mac install
  3. #Amd radeon r9 m395 drivers for mac driver
  4. #Amd radeon r9 m395 drivers for mac upgrade
  5. #Amd radeon r9 m395 drivers for mac windows 10

This thing, in any configuration is NOT designed around Adobe at all, if they’re going to ignore Nvidia.

#Amd radeon r9 m395 drivers for mac upgrade

You’re pretty much stuck using FCP on this, unless they offer Nvidia as an upgrade in the future. So “software-only” Premiere is going to crumble dealing with AMD. However, Premiere is a completely different animal with or without the Mercury engine, which means you need Nvidia. 15 minutes vs hours makes a big difference, which is where 8 GBs of ram would be a major roadblock.Ĭan’t see anyone seriously attempting to edit anything of significance on the minimum specs. Simply playing and cutting 4k shouldn’t necessarily be a problem, depending on how much footage you’re dealing with. So I’m just going by experience on high end Dell’s and HPs with CC. Truly hard to know without getting your hands on it. I happened to ask the same question on “”, and one poster said the following regarding the iMac Retina 5K and Premiere Pro CC and AE: Thanks again Walter and everyone else who replied to my post. Right now PCs seems more cost effective today and for expansion than what Apple is offering. I’m looking for machines that can cut well today and I can upgrade them as we move forward like I’ve done with my older Mac Pros. The 2 year old iMacs in the shop are capable of cutting with it no problem, just can’t do a lot of effects and render times are slow. We are already shooting, cutting and delivering 4k UHD. I guess you’ll be the first to tell us how it works.

#Amd radeon r9 m395 drivers for mac 1080p

But if (on an iMac Retina 5K) those CC programs can’t handle editing 4K footage or basic effects in a 1080p timeline, then that would be a deal breaker. If the iMac Retina 5K works as least as well as my 2012 iMac i7 in Premiere Pro CC and AE CC, then I’m sold. But I shoot 4K essentially for the creative freedom it gives me in post when mastering in 1080p. “I’m not planning on delivering 4K (much less 5K) any time soon. But on paper, I’m not lining up to buy this computer.Įditor, Colorist, Director, Writer, Consultant, Author, Chef.Ĭraft and Career Advice & Training from real Working Creative Professionals If someone wants to take one for a test spin and tell us it can easily drive the screen and provide a lot of realtime punch for Premiere Pro, I’ll reconsider. This machine seems more focused on wowing the production world with a “5k screen” instead of putting more horsepower behind that screen which would make it even more useful. I can get some gorgeous widescreen LG screens along with a power packed PC for about the same or a little more than this iMac plus have the ability to expand, upgrade the PC later. This new machine has a very impressive screen, but the rest of it just doesn’t “wow” me at all. We have two 27″ iMacs currently cutting in two of our edit suites and while they work great, they do get very hot. I’m continuing to look at PC workstations to replace the rest of my Mac Pros. I think the iMac is the best machine for editing on Apple, but I’m not lining up to buy this machine. According to Apple specs, there’s some other processor in there to drive the display, but we’re suspect until we see a real world test. It might work out perfectly fine, but many of us are scratching our heads wondering why an 8GB AMD card is not an option. The problem with the iMac, as least as far as we can tell, is that there’s only 4GB RAM on the graphics card to drive that display and help drive the performance of software such as Adobe Premiere Pro. If you were at NAB this past April you would have seen the latest AMD cards in a Dell screaming with 6k footage in Adobe Premiere Pro running with Open GL. Adobe supports Open GL just the same as CUDA. Happily playing BF 1 now (on Ultra no less)! Recommended.Nvidia is NO LONGER required for high performance with Adobe apps.

#Amd radeon r9 m395 drivers for mac install

Modded version available/is it safe to install the regular version? Or is there a game mod to solve thid (BF 1)?ĮDIT: Ended up choosing the Bootcampdrivers alternative because it looked easier.

amd radeon r9 m395 drivers for mac

#Amd radeon r9 m395 drivers for mac driver

Tl dr: Can't install latest M395X driver on BC Win10.

amd radeon r9 m395 drivers for mac

Is there a working, modded version of the latest M395X driver somewhere out there? Or is it maybe safe to install the 'regular' version of the driver instead of the Bootcamp one?Īlso, is there a way to mod the game itself (BF 1) so that it works on this driver? AFAIK it's not always the case that the game doesn't work at all on older GPU drivers, it's just that some graphics features might not be available. I then went to AMD's website for Bootcamp drivers, but they only have version 15.something available for download. However, opening the AMD control panel and updating from there doesn't work, because I end up getting a message saying that no AMD hardware was detected. I wanted to start a game and it said that my current GPU driver version isn't supported and that I need version 16.

#Amd radeon r9 m395 drivers for mac windows 10

I'm sure you know this problem, but here goes (tl dr below): I'm running Windows 10 on an iMac 5K with an AMD R9 M395X GPU.







Amd radeon r9 m395 drivers for mac